(or XXIII, numerals are obscure, page backs XXI, pages physically have no gaps or empty pages but numeration does not follow conventionally)

[See p. XVIII--Marx] The outstanding achievement of Hegel's Phanomenologie and of its final outcome, the dialectic of negativity as the moving and generating principle, is thus first that Hegel conceives the self-creation of man as a process, conceives objectification as 1oss of the object, as alienation and as transcendence of this alienation; that he thus grasps the essence of labour and comprehends objective man--true, because real man--as the outcome of man's own labour. The real, active orientation of man to himself as a species-being, or his manifestation as a real species-being (i.e., as a human being), is only possible if he really brings out all his species-powers something which in turn is only possible through the cooperative action of all of mankind, only as the result of history--and treats these powers as objects: and this, to begin with, is again only possible in the form of estrangement.

We shall now demonstrate in detail Hegel's one-sidedness and limitations as they are displayed in the final chapter of the Phanomenologie "Absolute Knowledge"--a chapter which contains the condensed spirit of the Phanomenologie, the relationship of the Phanomenologie to speculative dialectic, and also Hegel's consciousness concerning both and their relationship to one another.

Let us provisionally say just this much in advance:

Hegel's standpoint is that of modern political economy. He grasps labour as the essence of man--as man's essence which stands the test: he sees only the positive, not the negative side of labour. Labour is man's coming-to-be for himself within alienation, or as alienated man. The only labour which Hegel knows and recognises is abstractly mental labour. Therefore, that which constitutes the essence of philosophy--the alienation of man who knows himself or alienated science thinking itself--Hegel grasps as its

essence; and in contradistinction to previous philosophy he is therefore able to combine its separate aspects, and to present his philosophy as the philosophy. What the other philosophers did - that they grasped separate phases of nature and of human life as phases of self-consciousness, namely, of abstract self-consciousness--is known to Hegel as the doings of philosophy. Hence his science is absolute.

Let us now turn to our subject.

"Absolute Knowledge". The last chapter of the "Phanomenologie".

The main point is that the object of consciousness is nothing else but self-consciousness, or that the object is only objectified self-consciousness - self-consciousness as object. (Positing of man = self-consciousness).

The issue, therefore, is to surmount the object of consciousness. Objectivity as such is regarded as an estranged human relationship which does not correspond to the essence of man, to self-consciousness. The reappropriation of the objective essence of man, produced within the orbit of estrangement as something alien, therefore denotes not only the annulment of estrangement, but of objectivity as well. Man, that is to say, is regarded as a nonobjective, spiritual being.

The movement of surmounting the object of consciousness is now described by Hegel in the following way:

The object reveals itself not merely as returning into the self - this is according to Hegel the one-sided way of apprehending this movement, the grasping of only one side. Man is equated with self. The self, however, is only the abstractly conceived man - man created by abstraction. Man is selfish. His eye, his ear, etc., are selfish. In him, every one of his essential powers has the quality of selfhood. But it is quite false to say on that account "self-consciousness has eyes, ears, essential powers". Self-consciousness is rather a quality of human nature, of the human eye, etc.; it is not human nature that is a quality of

Send comments to: Lemmaesthetics@freeuk.com, The Hypertext Manuscripts of Karl Marx, Paris 1844, Copyright Gary Tedman 2001-3